Will there be a bubble for Web 2.0?

Web 2.0 bubble?

Lately, although supremely busy with client work, an upcoming move, and speaking engagement at the beginning of December, there has been something nagging at me about all the hype surrounding new social media and networking sites. To tell the truth, it’s been on my radar for over a year, however, I’m never one to cry wolf. But at this point, it’s really starting to concern me. How can consumer-generated content sites that don’t have a revenue model, outside of advertising, survive? Without advertising or subscriptions, what is their value and revenue stream long-term? Someone has to invest in the actual labour costs to build and maintain the site. People require salaries. The unfortunate part is that so many of these sites are the backbone of so much of social media. If a site isn’t gobbled up by a Microsoft or Google, can they sustain the costs, and when will the V.C. dry up once the acquisitions are unsustainable? I’m sorry, but the price MSFT paid to buy a piece of Facebook, when users clearly hate advertising (data-mining here we come? Which is something we should all be concerned about and could be a potential class-action waiting to happen), is ridiculous. It is so reminiscent of the very end of the dot-com bubble I’m surprised more warning bells aren’t going off.

How much can a company sustain on R&D for the potential of a critical mass to pay-off? Is $1 billion too much? $5 billion?

Based on how the North American economy is doing, I think any V.C. who invests in a niche non-product site without a clear revenue model, and international plan, is nuts.

Now, using the tools that are available for free strategically, or spending a realistic amount on a campaign based on carving out a chunk of your marketing budget is smart because there are potential customers there. But is buying, or investing in this type of site, at inflated prices, wholesale, without a clear ROI-structure a smart move? Is it a data-mining catastrophe waiting to happen, or will people begin to subscribe for the purpose of building a Facebook profile, or start to treat their social networking environment as a search tool with paid results going to MSN, Yahoo, or Google? Will they pay to be a part of the X-brand club? Personally, being the realist and cynic that I am, I opt for door #1… data-mining and more detailed targeting. Also, being the realist and marketer that I am, I don’t necessarily see that as a bad thing from a brand perspective. But will the ordinary Jane?
I am not sure, but I am concerned. I lived through one “bubble” and I really wouldn’t care for another! How long is free social networking without privacy and data-mining concerns sustainable? Will people care and will there be a backlash? Does Microsoft now have access to not only my computer desktop information, but also all my Facebook data? How will they use it? Are our regulations keeping pace? I don’t know… I do care… what do you think?

[photo credit: xdjio on Flickr]

Social Bookmarks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • NewsVine
  • Ma.gnolia
  • TailRank
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • SphereIt
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

Comments (5) to “Will there be a bubble for Web 2.0?”

  1. [...] Lately, although supremely busy with client work, an upcoming move, and speaking engagement at the beginning of December, there has been something nagging at me about all the hype surrounding new social media and networking sites. To tell the truth, its been on my radar for over a year, however, Im never one to cry wolf. But at this point, its really starting to concern me. How can consumer-generated content sites that dont have a revenue model, outside of advertising source: Will there be a bubble for Web 2.0?, Wildfire Strategic Marketing | (3i) marketing innovation, strategy and integration blog [...]

  2. Of course there will be a bubble - isn’t there one now? I think it’s more a matter of when will the bubble burst. When MySpace went for almost $600 million the alarm bells started going off - and that was over a year ago. Now Facebook is valued at $15 billion. It’s amazing how much people are willing to pay for a shot at grabbing people’s attention. It will be interesting to see what the next year looks like.

  3. It depends.

    (OK, OK… I’ll say more…)

    I think Rubel has been beating this drum, more sceptically with every post. In one of his many recent “Web 2.0 is a bubble” posts, though, he did at least differentiate between low-value pages like social networking dashboards where people will actively avoid intrusion, and the classic, high-value online services that get consumers with intent near the business end of the buy cycle. Let’s not throw out the baby with the bathwater.

  4. @andrew - that’s hilarious. I stopped reading Rubel about 6 months ago because *he* had drank the kool-aid! Just got caught back up on his latest posts now. Glad I’m not the only one concerned and harkening back to the dot.com crash.

  5. You say: “How can consumer-generated content sites that don‚Äôt have a revenue model, outside of advertising, survive?”

    My answer is: they can’t.

    It’s Darwinism. Adapt or die.

    Ad based revenue is “easy”. A no brainer. Slap ads on your site. For those go getters(!) — ad revenue from clients rather than brokers.

    Sites that will survive have other major sources of income (ads may be a small percentage). You have to be creative. And these alternative income sources won’t always be obvious (like merchandising). Or easy.

Post a Comment

*Required
*Required (Never published)