Comments for (3i)

Comment on MOCC does indeed Rock – Farewell my friend by Zunaid Khan

Zunaid Khan — Tue, 16 Oct 2012 11:52:13 +0000

Very nice post Tamera

Comment on MOCC does indeed Rock – Farewell my friend by tamera

tamera — Tue, 16 Oct 2012 02:16:30 +0000

You would’ve loved him Leigh.

Comment on MOCC does indeed Rock – Farewell my friend by Leigh

Leigh — Tue, 16 Oct 2012 01:08:16 +0000

Nice post Tamera. It all happens in an instant doesn’t it. would have loved to have been a fly on the wall for your BS conversation. that one woulda been fun.

xo lots of hugs and thoughts to you and MOCC’s family. f*ck cancer.

Comment on Why does Google get social content but not social networks? by » Riding the data wave

» Riding the data wave — Sat, 07 Apr 2012 01:18:50 +0000

[...] very frequent basis. The view is set to "news". Try clicking on "video" and "2" for more articles. >[caption id="" align="alignright" width="120" caption="OpenStreetMap Logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)"...treetMap Logo" width="120" height="120" [...]

Comment on Why does Google get social content but not social networks? by Sara

Sara — Tue, 03 Apr 2012 21:23:36 +0000

Thanks for the post Tamera, I love Google+ and wouldn’t doubt its potential for one second. Hey, they are Google! :)

In my opinion, what’s lacking from Google is the purpose of G+, how should we use it? Like Facebook for sharing, like Twitter for chatting, like YouTube for watching, like Quora for asking or, simply acts as hub for all these collectively; what’s missing from users besides things you point out, is also how they use it. Why bother posting same content to all channels?

Sharing information effectively to selected groups of people you mutually agree will benefit from, and start longer meaningful discussion which can be captured in one place is (I believe) one way of using G+, until it reaches critical mass of how to use it, keep the good content coming ! :)

Comment on Respect and the #SXSMROI panel by Panels, Promises, and Potshots | The darbyDARNIT Blog

Panels, Promises, and Potshots | The darbyDARNIT Blog — Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:18:05 +0000

[...] I read Tamera Kremer’s post: Respect and the #SXSMROI Panel. [...]

Comment on Respect and the #SXSMROI panel by tamera

tamera — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:34:50 +0000

Agreed Jonesy, been far too long, I’ll ping you and we’ll fix that.

Comment on Respect and the #SXSMROI panel by tamera

tamera — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:34:23 +0000

Absolutely you need to measure your activities, even in those phases, however it’s not the same ROI measurement as direct sales would be, it’s at a different point in the funnel. You aren’t tying it directly to conversion, it’s a softer measurement which many would argue isn’t the definition of true ROI.

Comment on Respect and the #SXSMROI panel by Bob LeDrew

Bob LeDrew — Thu, 15 Mar 2012 01:22:36 +0000

Lack of interest alert: I know none of the principals involved in this, I wasn’t at SX.

Based on everything I’ve read about this kerfuffle, here’s my take:

1. the panel doesn’t sound so good.
2. if you agree to be the centrepiece of a panel, you go.
3. If you can’t go, you give people PLENTY of notice.
4. If you can’t go to the panel you agreed to go to, you don’t trash it from afar.

My take: Olivier’s actions were graceless. If I had organized the panel, I would be justifiably p***ed.

Comment on Respect and the #SXSMROI panel by Dave Joned

Dave Joned — Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:35:51 +0000

Nice #tamerant ™.

Having not seen the panel and only caught the back and forth blog posts, it’s hard to judge what exactly is going on and who’s right and who’s wrong in this scrap.

I perceive from Olivier’s comments that he’s finished examining/explaining/justifying this particular incident, but I think your post was a nice approach to trying to get to “the grey” in this particular situation.

It’s been too lOng since we’ve sat down to compare notes. Let’s change that soon.